Impacts of Multiplex Boom

I think after multiplex boom happend in major cities of india, we can see new kinds of films being produced and marketed.Multiplex boom has both positive and negative impacts on our film industry. upto 1990s hindi film industry produced films mainly for small town and middle class population. So the story and characters of majority of films were targeted for these viewers. But now the situation is changed. Multiplexes have introduced new marketing and exhibition possibilities in front of Indian film industry. Multiple screens in multiplexes have created new spaces for low budget and art films. Before, those films can’t be screened in major theatres because they usually do not pull as much viewers to the theatre. Big theatres can’t function if the viewer attendance is mediate or low. But screens with lesser seats are very suitable for low budgets films. It will promote production of art cinema.But multiplexes are alienating lower class from theatres.

Due to the heavy ticket charge majority of population can’t approach multiplexes. Their dependence on television and cable network is increasing drastically. So the democratic space created by traditional theatres is vanishing gradually from cities. In Indian context it will create negative impact in a long run. The charaters coming from working class are now slowly disappearing.

"Boys do not cry"(2008, Korean)

When the Korean War ends in 1953, the country left with nothing but desperation. This film is about that period when the gangs ruled the urban Korea. It is about two orphaned boys, who lives in a relief camp where everyone suffers from hunger, inhumane treatment and unbearable work conditions. But these two have a dream of a better tomorrow. One of them has wits and brains and another is a tough street fighter. Together they scheme to collect rice from the neighborhood and to sell it in the coming winter season. They recruit other street boys in their business. But when they start to take business away from the local gangsters, their fight for survival turns into a war.
Nice film but not great one. Understated story and good performance by the actors.

Korea has made so many good films about their war.... i wonder why India never made a realistic good movie on any of our wars. Films like Boarder and LOC are terrible.

One of such themes is “Partition”. We can count Hindi films on Indian partition with fingers. It was such major national tragedy, even then for a long time the Indian film industry seldom addressed it. After 1990s some films were made on the theme like 1942 earth, train to Pakistan etc., but they were not mainstream films. Why mainstream film makers neglected this theme????
[Garam Hawa and Dharam Putra are the exceptional films on partition. I recommend you to watch both these films]

WHERE IS HERO IN HINDI CINEMA. WHERE R THEY GONE ??

The concept of Hero itself is personification of contemporary moral values i.e., the moral values of the contemporary society decide the “hero ship” of that time. It means by studying the hero (of novel, story, art forms, cinema, etc.,) we can learn the moral values of the time or vice versa. Moral values always changes with time. We can see the same in Hindi Film “Heroes”.

Who was a hero in Hindi films – he was a hard working, truthful, strong, handsome, kind, action orientated ‘MAN. He also represents a particular class (with all its qualities). In most of the films, Raj Kapoor, Guru datt, Manoj Kumar, Dileep Kumar, etc., represented those heroes. After independence the thirst for social change were seen their characters. In that period the class difference between the hero and Villon is the main stage of drama in many movies. Many of progressive artists came to film industry during that period.

But gradually that hero vanished to angry young man-who takes revenge against the prevailed corrupt society. The hope was changed to anger. “Amitab” was famous for such roles. Jitendra, Shatrughan sinha, Mithun etc., also played such roles.

Now due to globalization those heroes are also slowly vanishing. Now we do not know what should be the moral value of a hero. What should he stand for? The class struggle is almost vanished. Now we have heroes, who are very confused like us. What is right -what is wrong, he does not know. I am not saying whether it is good or bad, but it is the truth.

Villains of Popular Hindi Cinema

Let me share some of the interesting observations on popular Hindi cinema (I will not call it Bollywood).

The Hindi film industry always reflects the social realities of the nation-sometimes directly sometimes indirectly-most of the time by creating stereotype characters especially villains. If u study the kind of villains in Hindi films, u can sketch the changes happened in our society.

For example after independence when the whole nation was in a state of hope to build a better nation, the characters in the films represented that vision. That time the society was basically based in villages. Agriculture and ownership of land were the main issues. So Hindi film industry produced villain who was a greedy landlord who want to take over the poor man’s land. Even then almost every film ended with a note of hope to change this system.

Then when slowly the society gets more urbanized the villains became greedy factory owners. Then city “gunda” (mafia) became villain and police became hero. Slowly when the bureaucracy and law enforcing system in this country could not meet the demands of masses, gradually police became villain and interestingly the mafia man was raised to hero. After sometime politicians became villains and then Pakistan became main villain along with Muslim terrorists.

Oscar 2009

In the oscar nominated films, I personally feel that none of them is outstanding. Out the films (slumdog, Benjamin button, milk, frost/Nixon, and visitor) I like Milk compared to other movies. Slumdog is not more than a Hollywood entertainer, Benjamin button lags even though it has very interesting storyline, Frost/Nixon somewhere loses its political appeal, Visitor is a mediocre one.

“Milk” is a shocking revelation to the human right struggle of homosexual minority in USA. In this movie synchronization of personal life of Milk and his political movement is done in a unique way. Political discussions happening in personal level and in group level in this movie give a feel of watching a Ken Loach movie (but not politically that intense). Sean Penn has done a marvelous job in this movie (he is giving good competition to Brad Pitt in the best actor category).

JIFF award winning movie "Karna Motcham"

Director: S. Murali Manohar (Student of MGR film institute, Chennai)

Jaipur International Film Festival 2009

Jury(Me, Rakesh Andania and Sudipto) with Murali (director of award winning movie "Karna Motcham")

"Getting Home" (2007, Director: Zhang Yang)

It is one of the best Chinese films produced in the year 2007. Like Zhang Yang's earlier film "Shower" it is also an unusual story but honest tale of ordinary people. It is also a pulse counter of modern(developed). The film reflects the humane side of Chinese society as well as the emerging callous class difference and developmental paradigm of the society. The plot follows Zhao as a construction worker whose best friend dies, leaving him to fulfil a promise that he will return his body to his distant hometown. Short on money, the determined Zhao decides to carry his friend's corpse on his back, relying on help from the people he meets on his travels…

Some of the good Korean films of the year 2008

Forever the moment (Dir: Lim Soon-rye)
The film is about the unforgettable performance done by Korean women hand ball team during Athens Olympics. The film is really not about the hand ball game but about the women players and their hardships to perform well in the last game of their life. The final scene of the movie is unforgettable to me because I never seen such a brave decision taken by a director. The final penalty throw of the game is shot with really unexpected frame. This frame itself shows that the film is about the player not about the play.
Crossing (Dir: Kim Tae-kyun)
It is a story of a man living in North Korea crosses the border to China to get some medicine for his wife. He was then send back to South Korea and became an unwanted refugee prohibited to return to his family. Meanwhile his wife passes away and his young son sets out to find his father. It is one the best movie produced in Korea and nominated to contest in Oscar in the best foreign film category.
The Chaser (Dir: Hong-Jin Na)
Joong-ho is a pimp who was a detective once. He is in financial trouble as several of his girls have recently disappeared without clearing their debts. One night, he gets a call from a customer and sends one of his remaining girls Mi-jin. But when Mi-jin meets the customer, Jung-ho realizes the phone number of the customer matches that of the calls the missing girls got last. As something smells fishy, he searches for her. During his search, Jung-ho dents a car in the alley. When Jung-ho spots blood splattered on the driver’s shirt, he senses the man, Young-min, is the suspect. After an intense chase, Jung-ho finally catches Young-min. But because of Jung-ho’s pretence as a cop, they are both taken to the police station. At the station, he bluntly tells the policemen that he has killed the missing women, and the last girl, Mi-jin, may still be alive. As the police force is obsessed with a random search for corpses, Jung-ho is the only one who believes Mi-jin is still alive. With only 12 hours left to detain the serial killer without a warrant, Jung-ho’s hunt begins.
This film which was released this year became a surprise hit in South Korea. It was Hong-Jin Na's debt feature film and the actors are not so popular in the film industry. The budget of the film was also a mediocre one. After the slow start in the box office, the film became very popular through mouth publicity. It became one of the biggest hit of the year 2008 in South Korea. The breath taking performance of the leading artists, craftsmanship of the director and thrilling storyline are the plus point of this movie.
Dream (Dir: Kim Ki Duk)
The story revolves around a man and his dreams. One day he dreams that he caused a car accident. He goes to the place where the dream occurred, and surprisingly finds that an actual hit-and-run accident has occurred there, and that the police have traced it to a woman with a sleepwalking disorder. Later he finds that there is an unexplainable connection between the two. They discover that whenever he dreams, the woman acts out his dream in her sleep. So they came to an agreement-they will not sleep at the same time. But it is too difficult to do so. Tragedy is waiting at the corner…..Even though the film has an interesting storyline, Kim ki duk fails to convert it into a unforgettable viewing experience (like his previous films-Time and Breath). Also "Kim ki dukian twist" is missing in this film. I can almost predict the climax of the movie.Visually it is not appealing like his other films.
Tokyo (Michel Gondry, Leos Carax and Joon ho-Bong)
It is a omnibus film directed by three directors with each segment shot in Tokyo.
First story of the film is directed by Gondry called “Interior Design”. It is about the surreal fable of a couple who move to Tokyo in search of a future. The second film is directed by Carax called “Merde” is about a mysterious sewer dwelling man spreading chaos in Tokyo town through irrational and provocative acts. The third story is made by Joon ho-Bong(one of my favorite Korean film director who made Memories of Murder). This story is about Teruyuki, one of Japan’s many hikimori- citizens who have withdrawn from all contact with the outside world.

Two highly hyped but disappointed movies of the year

1. The Good, The Bad, The Weird (Kim Jee-woon) (biggest money grosser of the year in Korea)

2. Once upon a time in corea (Jeong Yong-ki)

Kim ki duk's new movie "Dream"(2008)

I got a chance to watch kim ki duk's new movie Dream (Bi-mong). The new film(15th) will, as in many of KIM's previous works, distort the boundaries between reality and dream. The story revolves around a man and his dreams. One day he dreams that he caused a car accident. He goes to the place where the dream occurred, and surprisingly finds that an actual hit-and-run accident has occurred there, and that the police have traced it to a woman with a sleepwalking disorder. Later he finds that there is an unexplainable connection between the two. They discover that when ever he dreams, the woman acts out his dream in her sleep. So they came to an agreement-they will not sleep at the same time. But it is too difficult to do so. Tragedy is waiting at the corner….. Even though the film has an interesting storyline, Kim ki duk fails to convert it into a unforgettable viewing experience (like his previous films-Time and Breath). Also "Kim ki dukian twist" is missing in this film. I can almost predict the climax of the movie.Visually it is not appealing like his other films.

John Pilger

I came know about John Pilger only last year. He is an inspiring news reporter and documentary film maker. After watching many of his documentaries, i feel that his films should be included in the media cariculum. In an interview when he was aked "what is wrong with journalism today?" his reply was very interesting

John Pilger: Many journalists now are no more than channelers and echoers of what Orwell called the official truth. They simply cipher and transmit lies. It really grieves me that so many of my fellow journalists can be so manipulated that they become really what the French describe as functionaires, functionaries, not journalists.Many journalists become very defensive when you suggest to them that they are anything but impartial and objective. The problem with those words "impartiality" and "objectivity" is that they have lost their dictionary meaning. They've been taken over. "Impartiality" and "objectivity" now mean the establishment point of view. Whenever a journalist says to me, "Oh, you don't understand, I'm impartial, I'm objective," I know what he's saying. I can decode it immediately. It means he channels the official truth. Almost always. That protestation means he speaks for a consensual view of the establishment. This is internalized. Journalists don't sit down and think, "I'm now going to speak for the establishment." Of course not. But they internalize a whole set of assumptions, and one of the most potent assumptions is that the world should be seen in terms of its usefulness to the West, not humanity. This leads journalists to make a distinction between people who matter and people who don't matter. The people who died in the Twin Towers in that terrible crime mattered. The people who were bombed to death in dusty villages in Afghanistan didn't matter, even though it now seems that their numbers were greater. The people who will die in Iraq don't matter. Iraq has been successfully demonized as if everybody who lives there is Saddam Hussein. In the build-up to this attack on Iraq, journalists have almost universally excluded the prospect of civilian deaths, the numbers of people who would die, because those people don't matter.It's only when journalists understand the role they play in this propaganda, it's only when they realize they can't be both independent, honest journalists and agents of power, that things will begin to change.

The War Dance

Dir: Sean Fine & Andrea Nix - 2007
A fine documentary on horrible war and music. The film blends the horrific stories of three child victims of war with youthful hope for the future through music. The cinematography is outstanding. The directors manage to capture the beautiful landscape of Uganda's war-torn north while also showing how ravaged both the countryside and families have been during the last decades. The music that propels the film forward was also inspiring, wonderful and unique to ears.

The willow tree

dir: Majid Majidi - 2005
A moving, thought-provoking movie from Majid Majidi (director of children of heaven and color of paradise). It is a story of Youssef, a blind university professor, who spends his time playing with his young daughter, and has his wife assist him with his work. From the onset, it's a happy little family, except that Youssef has a dream, that he could one day regain his sight and see again.Life is always unexpecting one, you do not know what is there waiting for for u........ Visually speaking, the weaving of light with dark scenes allows the story to further come to life giving a final illumination on a story that shares, sympathizes and delivers.The film might seem simple - few key characters (lovable too), gorgeously shot, and you might think you have the plot all wrapped up, there's always this beauty in the simplicity of it all, and its powerful underlying message ever so subtle, in no way sledge-hammering itself on you at all.

My favorite children's films

Bicycle thieves (1948, Italian, Dir: Vittorio De Sica)
Grave of fireflies (1988, Japanese, Dir: Isao Takahata)
Children of Heaven ( 1997, Iranian, Dir: Majid Majidi)
My Neighbor Totoro (1988, Japanese, Dir: Miyazaki)
Color of paradise(2000, Iranian, Dir: Majid Majidi)
Spirited Away (2001, Japanese, Dir: Miyazaki)
Not one less (1999, Chinese, Dir: Zhang Yimou)
The way home (2002, Korean, Dir: Jeong-hyang Lee)
Life is beautiful (1997, Italian, Dir: Roberto Benigni)
Ali Zaoua: Prince of the Streets (2000, Moroccan, Dir: Nabil Ayouch)
Kes (1969, English, Dir: Ken Loach)
E.T (1982, English, Dir: Steven Spielberg)

Miyazaki the Magician

Hayao Miyazaki films touch our hearts warmly and leave a feel of nostalgia. Canvas of most of his films was created from fairy tales and he painted it with the colours of real world. He denies violence (in any forms) and dreams about a harmonic world. His characters prove that human life becomes more meaningful when it shares the same destiny with the nature – simple and away from modern complexities. The idea of class struggle can be traced out from his movies and they proclaim humanity over the concept of modern development. The main features of his films are – simple storyline, ordinary characters in extra ordinary situations, elements of humanity, anti-war messages, environmentalism, denies violence, absence of stereotype characters, denies the concept of good versus evil, upholding the power of labour etc.,
His must see films are
Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (1984)
Laputa: Castle in the Sky (1986)
My Neighbor Totoro (1988)
Kiki's Delivery Service (1989)
Spirited Away (2001, Oscar winner)
Howl's Moving Castle (2004)

My neighbor Totoro is one of the best animation movies ever produced in any language in the world.

Mumabi Meri Jaan

The film Mumabi meri jaan is one of the best films produced in hindi in the recent time. it is a rare combination of social consciousness and craftsmanship. The film is about mumbai and its people. It is about anger, humility, humanity, fear, self realizations, hate and self loathing, all surfacing over the heartbeats of mumbai. Here parallel story telling technique is used without hurting the flow of the story. The story starts from the footage of the famous independence day speech by Nehru accompanied by the visuals of changing face of mumbai. The main characters in this film are living in mumbai who have nothing in common -police constable, TV journalist, coffeewallah, technocrat, unemployed suspicious young man, etc., All there life were suddenly changed by a bomb explosion in the metro train. The explosion has brought different feelings in the characters. one of them becomes more suspicious about Muslims, another one fears to travel in trains, the coffeewallah plays with the paranoid, the wisdom of the retiring cop always in confrontation with the idealistic cop who had to cancel his holiday.. and the tv journo who has now become the story.. The film strongly criticize the media. Must watch film...!!!!!!!!!!!

The threats of narrow identity politics

I know many of you guys are not interested in politics but I would like to share some information because I think it is very important for our future and future of our country. Many of us are not aware how the Sangh Pariwar is emerging as a powerful force in India. After Gujarat massacre and the consecutive victories in the state assembly elections one thing they (Sangh Pariwar) understood was that mass violence and destructive identity politics (and thus creating fear psychosis) is very effective in gathering votes and thus capturing power. Now they have got multiple locations to carry out this exercise (Orissa, Karnataka, M.P and Rajasthan, etc,). They are playing with religious identity politics.

Let me explain some details about the identity politics. Identity is a crucial element in social life. When someone ask you the question who are you? What answer will u give? Name, sex, physical features, family, place, occupation, hobbies, ethnicity, religion, affiliations, nationality etc. This is the identity of a person living in a society. All of us have multiple identities - some identities are inherited by birth like sexuality, physical features, etc, and some identities are gathered from the social life like religion, nationality, occupation, etc.

Now let me ask one question. When i ask, who are you? Why do you have to give this much of information? It basically because you are differentiating yourself from "others". There are females in this world that is why you have to write I am a male (if there are only males in this world no one would ask this question to you); there are "other" different religions in this society that is why you have to say "i am Hindu or Muslim or Christian", there are "other" hobbies in this world that is why you have to say I like cricket. So we can say that it is because of "others", I have an identity in this world.

Identities become prominent when identity conflicts happen. Let me explain that. When you are living in India and someone asks you who are you? Usually you don't have to tell that u r an Indian. But when u go to other countries and someone asks you, who you are? You have to tell I am Indian. So you will be more conscious about your identity when u faces conflicts.

There are individual identities (like name) as well as group identity (like religion, nationality). In social life consciously or unconsciously we compare, associate and differentiate us with others. That is why we wear "Poonnool" or "Cap" or "Uniform" etc. The concept of "others" is very powerful to create and run a nation. For an example: The nation "India" is formed because of the presence of an "other". The states in India are different in language (very important identity which creates majority of nations), culture and geographical features. Even then the unity of India is formed because of the freedom fight against the "other - British". And it is only that fight which brought us together to form a nation called “India”. So the "other" is very important in politics that is why we use the word "ideology" (without even thinking that what it actually means).

Now, let me come to the present scenario. All the political movements and "ideologies" always associate itself with some group identities - sometimes in a broader sense and sometimes in a narrow way. Ideology of communists and socialists associate itself with the identity of working class. The working class is a broader identity - means it includes men, women, all religions, all nationalities, etc. That is why the socialist party and communist parties spread across the globe.

On the contrary, there were other parties which used narrow identities in politics like Hitler's NAZI party - which was created on the basis of "ARYAN" identity. He had successfully implemented the politics of superior and inferior identities, which means by birth you belong to a superior race or inferior race. So, all the inferior races should be terminated or bring under "control" by the superior race to achieve the ultimate development. For NAZI party "Jews", "Communists", all races other than ARYANS were the others. He had carried out genocides on the basis of this identity politics. But ultimately it resulted in the collapse of German State.

Now in India we are facing such a narrow and dangerous identity politics- which tells us all Muslims, Christian’s, secular forces are threats to our nation. They have created an artificial & unrealistic "HINDU IDENTITY" and proclaim the superiority of that religion. One of their famous statements is that "All Muslims are not terrorists but all terrorists are Muslims" (after sometime they will say that all Muslims are terrorists or sympathizers of terrorism). The reality is that majority of terrorist group in the world are non-muslim organizations like LTTE, ULFA, IRA, etc., also please don't forget Khalistan movement). According to the UN declaration. the biggest terrorist group in the world is not Al-qaeda but LTTE (which includes Hindus also).

This political formation is systematically spreading the communal agenda throughout the country. There are ample number of evidences that many of the so called terrorist attacks were manipulated by Bajrang Dal and such communal organisations. Why r they doing this? Simply so as to create the "other" as Muslims who are monstrous & dangerous. Once you created that image then it is easy to polarise the society and implement the fear psychosis. Media is the best tool to do so. Throughout India Bajrang Dal and such fundamentalist groups are training people to take arms up against minority communities and secular forces.

Sangh Pariwar is really a threat not only to the minority communities but to our democratic system too. They are against our constitution which is built on secular values and principles of human rights. The pluralistic India is facing extinction. What can we do to stop this. Whatever religion you belongs to or whatever political party you belong to this is the time to act because we are moving towards a fascist nation.

The time is reached to recognise this truth and tell your fellow citizens about it.

Bloody Sunday

I just want to say this to the British Government... You know what you've just done, don't you? You've destroyed the civil rights movement, and you've given the IRA the biggest victory it will ever have. All over this city tonight, young men... boys will be joining the IRA, and you will reap a whirlwind........

(Ivan Cooper, Leader, Irish civil right movement after Bloody sunday massacre)

Bloody Sunday is a classic political drama directed by Paul Greengrass (Director of Bourne Series). The film is a unique attempt to recreate the events happened in Northern Ireland on January 30, 1972 popularly known as bloody Sunday. Many survivors of that day took part in the production of the film along with people of the city. There was not a single artificial light used for the production of the film and whole film was shot using handheld camera. So the viewers feels that they are "on the spot" witnessing the events. The film shows how the civil right movement was replaced by the violence of IRA due to the brutal action by the British govt.
Really haunting film...!!

Shaurya & Summer 2007

"We don't confront anything that's uncomfortable. But the fact of the matter is that the Indian Muslim is living a very real crisis. This film is born of a very private anguish. Why is it that a Khan is asked to prove his patriotism in this country while a Jha is not? Why do I've to wear my patriotism on the sleeve?"
(Samar Khan)

After a long time Bollywood is speaking something different, different from what we conceived about Bollywood. Not the stars, but the story has captured the attention this time. Here I am talking about two films which have bravely addressed uncomfortable realities of our time.

"Shaurya" (dir: Samar Khan) & "Summer 2007" (dir: Suhail Tatari)

Shaurya

The movie revolves around the court martial of a Muslim officer, Javed Khan, in the Indian Army for shooting his commanding officer and is set against the backdrop of the Kashmir Conflict in Northern India. Rahul Bose (Maj. Siddhant Chaudhary) is assigned to be Javed Khan's defence lawyer, and the story revolves around his investigations in the circumstances leading up to the shooting.

Summer 2007

Summer 2007 starts with an unexpected opening scene of a man setting himself on fire in the middle of a crop field (title indicates that it is happening in Vidarbha, Maharashtra). Then director leads us away from this village to a rich private medical college, where we meet 5 students hooked onto MTV culture. We can see the non-political atmosphere of the campus as an orchestrated vanity fair. The 5 students ask for a transfer (to attend rural service) in order to escape from the campus election. With the expectation of enjoying the title summer in Goa, they insist on a placement nearby. As an outcome they land up in one of the most deprived villages in Maharashtra.

Their rural posting turns into a soul searching journey where they are forced to confront their own apathy, their own fears and their strange complicity in the circumstances of the village. Before they can run from there, they get sucked into the whirlpool of counter currents. Each of the five undergo different kinds of catharsis and in the end have to make a choice. Do they leave the mess just as they had found it and get away from there...or do they choose to get involved?

The director bravely presents an issue that one has only read in the newspaper or heard on the news channel and immediately forgotten thereafter. He does not throw the message in your face nor does he preach to us about solutions. He presents the reality of Indian villages in the era of "Economic Growth". He criticize media, politicians, economic policies, feudal system still prevails in India, money lending mafia, police force(which creates naxalites out of poor villagers), etc.,

A rare movie in Indian context……

Both these films are not classic films. They have their own draw backs. In the first film (Shaurya) the climax became too simplistic (but we can see the excellent performance by the main actors). In the second film the selection of actors was not up to the mark (the main actor is a new comer and just learning the basics of acting). The first part of Summer 2007 is too long. Even then these films deserve attention from viewers who love serious movies.

But unfortunately Summer 2007 became a big flop in the box office and Shaurya was an average hit. Our film critiques also ignored these films. I fear if such films are not recognized, in future no director will show the courage to take up such issues in colloid format.

The Cave of the Yellow Dog

Today I have seen a marvelous film in which we can feel the death of nature and the noiseless love in its original form. The film remains about a totally different world available to us in contrast to the modern excitements (bullets, speed, explosions, fast food etc.). The story is so simply and genuine – in an isolated Mongolian grassland place a nomad family spends summer season. One of the little girls in this family makes friendship with a cute puppy she finds in a cave; her father wants her to leave dog where she found it - little girl struggles to keep dog. It is exciting to see a mode of life so totally different to our own and portrayed so honestly and without any moral squint at all. Its beauty lies in its simple storyline and seemingly unobstructed participants. The way the each character in this film interact with each other, and especially the way the children express love and affection to each other was amazing. The cast in The Cave of the Yellow Dog are actually a real family of amateur actors. However, what they achieved through this film can’t be achieved by any professional actors in this world.

The director of this movie is Byambasuren Davaa, a Mongolian filmmaker living in Germany. You may familiar with her earlier work The Story of the Weeping Camel (also an excellent work). Through her films she portrays the life of nomads in Mongolia. The subjects of her movies also serve as amateur actors, playing mostly themselves, which positions her work somewhere between documentary and fiction.